That carries far more serious repercussions in terms of the Russian constitutional statements about its ability to protect itself. That could involve more serious weaponry, including the use of tactical nukes for Russia to protect what it would then view as part of its territory.

Perhaps subtle for the West, but not for the millions of Ukrainians, Russians and related peoples who had considered themselves as part of a dysfunctional, yet still operational family. Declaring war upon Ukraine denies the country its ethnic background, places it firmly as part of the Western bloc and immediately sites the Ukrainians themselves as enemies of Russia. It splits the Russian-Ukrainian mixed identity into two and will create much hatred on both sides.

At this point the opinion of the West ceases to matter. Ukraine attacks, especially those supported by Western provided military will be seen as acts of war which then permit the use of weapons of mass destruction.

@DiMagnaySky President Putin's speech is pretty much in line with the paranoia that we've seen from him.

The divided opposition stood little chance against the popular leader, his closest competitor notching around 13 percent of the vote.

The director of the Levada Center, Denis Volkov, stated in 2015 that drawing any conclusions from Russian poll results or comparing them to polls in democratic states was pointless as there is pelo real political competition in Russia, where, unlike in democratic states, Russian voters are not offered any "credible alternatives" and public opinion is primarily formed by state-controlled media which promotes those in power and discredits any alternative candidates.[559]

Putin also wrote off any speculation that there would be a further incursion into Ukrainian territory, saying, "Such a measure would certainly be the very last resort." 

The practice of the system is characterized by Swedish economist Anders Åslund as manual management, commenting: "After Putin resumed the presidency in 2012, his rule get more info is best described as 'manual management' as the Russians like to put it.

E este desafio para o Ocidente? Saiba como lidar usando um líder russo qual deixou bem claro qual está preparado para usar armas nucleares de modo a evitar uma derrota.

The president also threatened nuclear retaliation, saying that Russia had “lots of weapons to reply” to what he called western threats on Russian territory and added that he was not bluffing.

On 7 October 2006, Anna Politkovskaya, a journalist who exposed corruption in the Russian army and its conduct in Chechnya, read more was shot in the lobby of her apartment building, on Putin's birthday.

Why you can trust Sky News President Putin has accused read more the West of engaging in "nuclear blackmail" and warned he has "lots of weapons to reply" as he called up more info 300,000 more troops to the Ukraine war.

The destruction of Kievan Rus' saw the eventual rise of the Grand Duchy of Moscow, read more initially a part of Vladimir-Suzdal.[55]: 11–20  While still under the domain of the Mongol-Tatars and with their connivance, Moscow began to assert its influence in the region in the early 14th century,[56] gradually becoming the leading force in the "gathering of the Russian lands".

Putin later stated that interference was "theoretically possible" and could have been perpetrated by "patriotically minded" Russian hackers,[194] and on another occasion claimed "not even Russians, but Ukrainians, Tatars or Jews, but with Russian citizenship" might have been responsible.